Back to Harry's Corner

An Unusual Pacing ECG

Harry's Corner /

Fun with ECG’s

/

An Unusual Pacing ECG

Author

Assoc Prof Harry Mond

Published

February 27, 2025

Download a free PDF copy!

To receive a free PDF copy of The Fundamentals of Electrocardiograph Interpretation by Harry Mond, subscribe to his email blog by entering your email address below.  

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Purchase the textbook

Purchase a hard cover or paperback copy of The Fundamentals of Electrocardiograph Interpretation by Harry Mond on Amazon.

Purchase textbook

This is an old pacing ECG, which has a number of interesting features.

It was performed two hours after the implant.

Old pacing ECG

Suggest you look at it carefully before going on.

Firstly, there is high voltage (5V) unipolar pacing. The stimulus artefacts are tall. Remember the stimulus artefact represents the electrical energy delivered to the myocardium via the cathode.

It is a voltage for a set period of time called the pulse duration or width. During this period, there is a voltage drop or exponential decay curve.

There are two ways of delivering this energy via the cathode; unipolar or bipolar.

All electrical circuits must have a negative cathode and a positive anode. With unipolar pacing, there is only one pole on the lead and the anode is on the can of the pulse generator. For bipolar pacing, both are on the lead. The current flow is across the chest for unipolar pacing, but local for bipolar. Hence unipolar pacing gives a tall stimulus artefact.

It is important to remember that a tall stimulus artefact will distort the ECG baseline with a decay curve, which is the after potential.

Consequently, the first 40 to 60 ms may be all artefact, which is not seen with bipolar pacing.The decay curve can be seen with failure to capture or exit block and can confuse the ECG reporter into thinking it is an Q or R wave.

The simulus artefact size is voltage dependent!

Now let us return to the original ECG:

All the ECG leads are distorted by the stimulus artefact. Note there are no R waves from V2 to V6, as all are artefact. The chest leads suggest pacing from the apex of the right ventricle, but leads I to III don’t make sense.

I sent the tech back to repeat the ECG.

The new ECG limb leads (below) are compared with the old ones on the original ECG, which are now very different: Lead I is flipped, leads II and III are reversed, aVL and aVR are reversed and aVF is the same.

The arm leads (left arm and right arm) are reversed.

Here is a summary of reversed arm leads.

Latest Articles

July 16, 2026

What Do You Think 123

I came upon these ECG tracings of ventricular tachycardia from a Holter study in a 79-year old asymptomatic female. What do you think?

July 9, 2026

What Do You Think 122

No tricks. Just a selection of tracings from a Holter study.Look at each one carefully, use calipers, arrows and highlight and write down your conclusions.

July 2, 2026

What Do You Think 121

I came across these two tracings from the same patient during Holter reporting. Do you agree with the reported diagnoses?