Back to Harry's Corner

What Do You Think 26

Harry's Corner /

ECG Challenges

/

What Do You Think 26

Author

Assoc Prof Harry Mond

Published

March 18, 2025

Download a free PDF copy!

To receive a free PDF copy of The Fundamentals of Electrocardiograph Interpretation by Harry Mond, subscribe to his email blog by entering your email address below. Ā 

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Purchase the textbook

Purchase a hard cover or paperback copy of The Fundamentals of Electrocardiograph Interpretation by Harry Mond on Amazon.

Purchase textbook

Second opinion on an ECG from an elderly male with a reported long QT interval.

What do you think?

Let us revisit the normal limits of QTc intervals.

For a male, 470 ms is well within the range of prolonged QTc.

Ā 

How do we measure the QT interval?

For consistency and reproducibility, theĀ ā€œmaximum slope interceptā€ or ā€œtangentā€ methodĀ is recommended to define the termination of the T wave.

The QT interval (red arrow) is measured from the beginning of the QRS complex to the point of intersection between the tangent drawn through the maximum down slope (blue line) and the vertical line (green line), which transects it at the baseline.

Let us return to our case study and measure the QT.

I chose V2 for illustrative purposes only. We usually use lead II or V5, V6. Ā 

The QTc I calculated was also long.

Ā 

However, on review of the ECG, the extension of the T wave was not a U wave, but rather a P wave and the diagnosis was a long PR interval and not a long QTc.

Remeasuring the QT/QTc obtained a Bazett of 437 ms, which is in the normal range.

The first and still the most utilized correction formula was the one designed by Bazett over a 100- years ago. It is most accurate when the sinus rate lies between 60 and100 bpm. The Bazett formula both under-corrects at over-corrects when the heart rates are fast or slow. The Bazett correction is logarithmic, whereas theHodges is linear and more accurate over wider sinus rate changes.

Ā 

Our case was interpreted as a U wave. This added wave always creates a dilemma in calculating QTc. When fused into the T wave it is usually incorporated into theQT measurement as it is part of repolarization and hence the T wave. However, a separate U wave would extend the T wave and result in erroneous measurements.By definition, this would Ā be a QU measurement. Thus, by convention in everyday practice, these separate waves are usually ignored.

Some authorities recommend that when a prominent U wave is present, it is preferable to define the end of the T wave at the point where the wave is lowest or on the baseline referred to as the TU nadir (green vertical line). As can be seen, this is slightly longer than the tangent method (red vertical line).

Ā 

In summary, with QT measurements, beware of the added wave after the T wave. It may be a U wave, but you need to exclude a P wave. Perform manual measurements before concluding that there is a long QTc measurement.

Latest Articles

July 9, 2026

What Do You Think 122

No tricks. Just a selection of tracings from a Holter study.Look at each one carefully, use calipers, arrows and highlight and write down your conclusions.

July 2, 2026

What Do You Think 121

I came across these two tracings from the same patient during Holter reporting. Do you agree with the reported diagnoses?

June 26, 2026

What Do You Think 120

I was asked to review this Holter monitor, the report of which stated: ā€œSinus rhythm, ventricular rate ~ 90 bpm, Wenckebach AV blockā€. What do you think?